By Gabbie
How does religion affect prejudice? Are religious people as a whole more, or less, prone to being prejudiced? Or is this only true of specific religious groups?
I’m not going to try to directly answer any of these questions; instead I’m going to let the statistics speak for themselves. This survey was taken of high-school students aged 14-17. The survey was not large enough for this to be considered conclusive evidence, but these are still hard percentages that send a very interesting message.
In the first section, the questions were general-knowledge questions such as “the HIV virus can be spread by coughing or sneezing,” to which the respondents were asked to answer TRUE or FALSE. Answering incorrectly is defined as answering one or mor
e of the five questions incorrectly, while answering correctly is defined as answered none of the five questions incorrectly. I consider this section to be significant because ignorance feeds prejudice; someone who does not understand HIV is much more likely to fear or discriminate against people with HIV, as will become apparent from examining all four tables in
conjunction. This section includes the first two tables, below.
The next section includes the other two tables, and involved statements such as “Nations should be allowed to deny entry to immigrants with HIV,” “Governments should be able to publicize names of HIV+ citizens,” “If I found out that someone I knew had HIV, I would be angry, or place blame on him/her,” and “If I found out that someone I knew had HIV, I would avoid that person or stop spending time with him/her.” Respondents were asked to answer AGREE or DISAGREE, and agreeing was defined as answering AGREE to at least one statement of the nine that were given, while disagreeing meant answering DISAGREE to all of them. In the first of these two tables, the discrepancies between different demographics, though present, are much less marked than in any of the four tables; I think that the more important thing to note is that for every group, a huge percentage agreed with the statements.
If you looked at all four tables together, as I suggested, then you noticed that the group of which the highest percentage answered incorrectly to general-knowledge questions also had the highest percentage of members who agreed with discriminatory statements, and the group where the highest percentage answered correctly had the lowest percentage of members agreeing with those statements. Therefore I hope that, besides conveying a message about religion and prejudice, this data also speaks of something else: that ignorance is the foundation of prejudice and discrimination.